View source for Neo-colonial science

{{Short description|Misconduct by Western researchers who do not collaborate with local experts}}
'''Neo-colonial research''' or '''neo-colonial science''',<ref name="budiman">{{Cite journal|date=2020-08-15|title=Global soil science research collaboration in the 21st century: Time to end helicopter research|journal=Geoderma|language=en|volume=373|pages=114299|doi=10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114299|issn=0016-7061|doi-access=|last1=Minasny|first1=Budiman|last2=Fiantis|first2=Dian|last3=Mulyanto|first3=Budi|last4=Sulaeman|first4=Yiyi|last5=Widyatmanti|first5=Wirastuti|bibcode=2020Geode.373k4299M}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|last1=Dahdouh-Guebas|first1=Farid|last2=Ahimbisibwe|first2=J.|last3=Van Moll|first3=Rita|last4=Koedam|first4=Nico|date=2003-03-01|title=Neo-colonial science by the most industrialised upon the least developed countries in peer-reviewed publishing|url=https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022374703178|journal=Scientometrics|language=en|volume=56|issue=3|pages=329–343|doi=10.1023/A:1022374703178|s2cid=18463459|issn=1588-2861}}</ref> frequently described as '''helicopter research''',<ref name="budiman" /> '''parachute science'''<ref name="the-scientist.com">{{Cite web|title=Q&A: Parachute Science in Coral Reef Research|url=https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/qa-parachute-science-in-coral-reef-research-68489|access-date=2021-03-24|website=The Scientist Magazine®|language=en}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite web|title=The Problem With 'Parachute Science'|url=https://www.sciencefriday.com/segments/parachute-science-problem/|access-date=2021-03-24|website=Science Friday|language=en-US}}</ref> or '''research''',<ref>{{Cite news|title=Scientists Say It's Time To End 'Parachute Research'|url=https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2016/04/02/472686809/scientists-say-its-time-to-end-parachute-research|access-date=2021-03-24|website=NPR.org|language=en}}</ref> '''parasitic research,'''<ref name=":3" /><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Smith|first=James|date=2018-08-01|title=Parasitic and parachute research in global health|url=https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langlo/article/PIIS2214-109X(18)30315-2/abstract|journal=The Lancet Global Health|language=English|volume=6|issue=8|pages=e838|doi=10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30315-2|issn=2214-109X|pmid=30012263|s2cid=51630341|doi-access=free}}</ref> or  '''safari study''',<ref name="segen">{{Cite web|title=Helicopter Research|url=https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Helicopter+Research|access-date=2021-03-24|website=TheFreeDictionary.com}}</ref> is when researchers from wealthier countries go to a [[developing country]], collect information, travel back to their country, analyze the [[data]] and samples, and publish the results with no or little involvement of local researchers. A 2003 study by the [[Hungarian Academy of Sciences]] found that 70% of articles in a random sample of publications about [[least-developed countries]] did not include a local research co-author.<ref name=":1" />

Frequently, during this kind of research, the local colleagues might be used to provide logistics support as [[Fixer (person)|fixers]] but are not engaged for their expertise or given credit for their participation in the [[research]]. [[Scientific publication]]s resulting from parachute science frequently only contribute to the career of the scientists from rich countries, thus limiting the development of local science capacity (such as [[Research institute|funded research centers]]) and the careers of local scientists.<ref name="budiman" /> This form of "colonial" science has reverberations of 19th century scientific practices of treating non-Western participants as "others" in order to advance [[colonialism]]—and critics call for the end of these [[Extractivism|extractivist practices]] in order to [[Decolonization of knowledge|decolonize knowledge]].<ref name=":2">{{Cite web|last=Vos|first=Asha de|title=The Problem of 'Colonial Science'|url=https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-problem-of-colonial-science/|access-date=2021-03-24|website=Scientific American|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=The Traces of Colonialism in Science|url=https://observatory.tec.mx/edu-news/what-is-colonial-science|access-date=2021-03-24|website=Observatory of Educational Innovation|language=en-US}}</ref>

This kind of research approach reduces the quality of research because international researchers may not ask the right questions or draw connections to local issues.<ref name="Stefanoudis R184–R185">{{Cite journal|last1=Stefanoudis|first1=Paris V.|last2=Licuanan|first2=Wilfredo Y.|last3=Morrison|first3=Tiffany H.|last4=Talma|first4=Sheena|last5=Veitayaki|first5=Joeli|last6=Woodall|first6=Lucy C.|date=2021-02-22|title=Turning the tide of parachute science|journal=Current Biology|language=English|volume=31|issue=4|pages=R184–R185|doi=10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.029|issn=0960-9822|pmid=33621503|doi-access=free}}</ref> The result of this approach is that local communities are unable to leverage the research to their own advantage.<ref name=":0" /> Ultimately, especially for fields dealing with [[list of global issues|global issues]] like [[conservation biology]] which rely on local communities to implement solutions, neo-colonial science prevents [[institutionalization]] of the findings in local communities in order to address issues being studied by scientists.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":2" />

== Effects ==
The use of helicopter research has also led to a stigma of research within minority groups; some going so far as to deny research within their communities. Such safari studies lead to long-term negative  effects for the [[scientific community]] and researchers, as distrust develops within peripheral communities.<ref name="cnirb2">[https://irb.cherokee.org/media/rkknqeww/helicopter-research.pdf Cherokee Nation IRB: Helicopter Research]</ref>

=== Donor robbery ===
Funds for research in developing countries are often provided by bilateral and international academic and research programmes for [[sustainable development]]. Through 'donor robbery' a large proportion of such international funds may end up in the wealthier countries via consultancy fees, laboratory costs in rich universities, overhead or purchase of expensive equipment, hiring expatriates and running "enclave" research institutes, depending on international [[Conglomerate (company)|conglomerates]] such as [[CGIAR]].<ref name="budiman2">{{Cite journal|last1=Minasny|first1=Budiman|last2=Fiantis|first2=Dian|last3=Mulyanto|first3=Budi|last4=Sulaeman|first4=Yiyi|last5=Widyatmanti|first5=Wirastuti|date=2020-08-15|title=Global soil science research collaboration in the 21st century: Time to end helicopter research|journal=Geoderma|language=en|volume=373|pages=114299|doi=10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114299|bibcode=2020Geode.373k4299M|issn=0016-7061|doi-access=}}</ref>

=== Use of open data ===
The current tendency of [[Open data|freely availing research datasets]] may lead to exploitation of, and rapid publication of results based on data pertaining to developing countries by rich and well-equipped research institutes, without any further involvement and/or benefit to local communities;<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Lima |first1=Renato A. F. de |last2=Phillips |first2=Oliver L. |last3=Duque |first3=Alvaro |last4=Tello |first4=J. Sebastian |last5=Davies |first5=Stuart J. |last6=de Oliveira |first6=Alexandre Adalardo |last7=Muller |first7=Sandra |last8=Honorio Coronado |first8=Euridice N. |last9=Vilanova |first9=Emilio |last10=Cuni-Sanchez |first10=Aida |last11=Baker |first11=Timothy R. |last12=Ryan |first12=Casey M. |last13=Malizia |first13=Agustina |last14=Lewis |first14=Simon L. |last15=ter Steege |first15=Hans |date=11 April 2022 |title=Making forest data fair and open |journal=Nature Ecology & Evolution |doi=10.1038/s41559-022-01738-7 |pmid=35411093 |url=https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/186051/|last16=Ferreira |first16=Joice |last17=Marimon |first17=Beatriz Schwantes |last18=Luu |first18=Hong Truong |last19=Imani |first19=Gerard |last20=Arroyo |first20=Luzmila |last21=Blundo |first21=Cecilia |last22=Kenfack |first22=David |last23=Sainge |first23=Moses N. |last24=Sonké |first24=Bonaventure |last25=Vásquez |first25=Rodolfo|volume=6 |issue=6 |pages=656–658 |s2cid=248101054 }}</ref> similarly to the historical open access to [[tropical forest]]s that has led to the disappropriation ("Global Pillage") of plant [[genetic resources]] from developing countries.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Low|first=Alex|date=2001|title=The Third Revolution: Plant Genetic Resources in Developing Countries and China: Global Village or Global Pillage|url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/itbla6&id=337&div=&collection=|journal=International Trade and Business Law Annual|volume=6|pages=323}}</ref>

=== Professional discourse ===
In certain fields of research, such as global public health,<ref name=Horton>{{Cite journal|last=Horton|first=Richard|date=2013-11-23|title=Offline: Is global health neocolonialist?|url=https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(13)62379-X/abstract|journal=The Lancet |language=English |volume=382 |issue=9906 |pages=1690 |doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62379-X |s2cid=54269192|issn=0140-6736}}</ref> both the journals and professionals creating the field have defined much of their work under colonial structures and assumptions.<ref name=Horton/> This in turn prevents participation in the field from early in the process, even before authorship or credit is given during the publishing representation of editorial boards of journals publishing in environmental sciences and public health, with a vast majority of editors based in high-income countries despite the global scope of the journals' fields.<ref name=Dada>{{Cite journal |last1=Dada |first1=Sara |last2=Daalen |first2=Kim Robin van |last3=Barrios-Ruiz |first3=Alanna |last4=Wu |first4=Kai-Ti |last5=Desjardins |first5=Aidan |last6=Bryce-Alberti |first6=Mayte |last7=Castro-Varela |first7=Alejandra |last8=Khorsand |first8=Parnian |last9=Zamorano |first9=Ander Santamarta |last10=Jung |first10=Laura |last11=Malolos |first11=Grace |date=2022-06-21 |title=Challenging the "old boys club" in academia: Gender and geographic representation in editorial boards of journals publishing in environmental sciences and public health |url=https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0000541 |journal=PLOS Global Public Health |language=en |volume=2 |issue=6 |pages=e0000541 |doi=10.1371/journal.pgph.0000541 |s2cid=249939973 |issn=2767-3375|doi-access=free |hdl=10197/13070 |hdl-access=free }}</ref>

==Mitigation==
Some journals and publishers are implementing policies that should mitigate the impact of parachute science. One of the conditions for publication set by the journal ''[[Global Health Action]]'' is that, "Articles reporting research involving [[Raw data|primary data]] collection will normally include researchers and institutions from the countries concerned as authors, and include in-country ethical approval."<ref>{{Cite web|title=Submit to Global Health Action|url=https://www.tandfonline.com/action/authorSubmission?show=instructions&journalCode=zgha20&|access-date=2021-03-24|website=www.tandfonline.com}}</ref> Similarly ''[[The Lancet Global Health]]'' placed restriction encouraged submissions to review their practices for including local participants.<ref name=":3">{{Cite journal|last=Health|first=The Lancet Global|date=2018-06-01|title=Closing the door on parachutes and parasites|url=https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langlo/article/PIIS2214-109X(18)30239-0/abstract|journal=The Lancet Global Health|language=English|volume=6|issue=6|pages=e593|doi=10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30239-0|issn=2214-109X|pmid=29773111|s2cid=21725769|doi-access=free}}</ref>  Similarly in 2021, [[PLOS]] announced a policy that required changes in reporting for researchers working in other countries.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2021-09-27|title=Announcing a new PLOS policy on inclusion in global research|url=https://theplosblog.plos.org/2021/09/announcing-a-new-plos-policy-on-inclusion-in-global-research/|access-date=2021-10-11|website=The Official PLOS Blog|language=en-US}}</ref>

A number of research communities are putting protocols in place for indigenous health information. In the US, the [[Cherokee Nation]] established a specific [[Institutional Review Board]], aiming at ensuring the protection of the rights and welfare of tribal members involved in research projects.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Cherokee Nation Institutional Review Board|url=https://irb.cherokee.org/|access-date=2021-03-24|website=Cherokee Nation Institutional Review Board|language=en-US}}</ref> The Cherokee Nation IRB does not allow helicopter research.<ref name="cnirb2" /> The [[Human Heredity and Health in Africa]] (H3Africa) Initiative launched guidelines for working with genetic information from the continent in 2018.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Nordling|first=Linda|date=2018-04-18|title=African scientists call for more control of their continent's genomic data|url=https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-04685-1|journal=Nature|language=en|doi=10.1038/d41586-018-04685-1}}</ref>

An [[Ethiopia]]n soil scientist, [[Mitiku Haile]], suggests that such "free riding" should be "condemned by all partners and, if found, should be brought to the attention of the scientific community and the international and national funding agencies".<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Haile|first1=Mitiku|date=2020-08-15|title=Response to "Global soil science research collaboration in the 21st century: Time to end helicopter research"|journal=Geoderma|language=en|volume=373|pages=114300|doi=10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114300|bibcode=2020Geode.373k4300H|issn=0016-7061|doi-access=}}</ref>

Also in Africa, since the outbreak of the [[COVID-19 pandemic|coronavirus pandemic]] in 2020, travel restrictions on international scholars tend to local scientists stepping up to lead research.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2020-07-15|title=Africa sees end to 'helicopter research' as pandemic changes minds|url=https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/africa-sees-end-helicopter-research-pandemic-changes-minds|access-date=2021-03-24|website=Times Higher Education (THE)|language=en}}</ref>

== Examples by field ==
Examples of neo-colonial approaches to science include:
*In the medical world: "A popular term for a [[clinical research|clinical]] or [[epidemiology|epidemiologic]] research project conducted by foreign scientists who use local contacts to gain access to a population group and obtain samples"<ref name="segen" /> 
* In [[anthropology]], particularly when related to peripheral [[ethnic group]]s: "Any investigation within the community in which a researcher collects data, leaves to disseminate it, and never again has contact with the tribe."<ref name="cnirb2"/>
*In [[geosciences]], a 2020 study found that 30% of studies about Africa contained an African author.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=North|first1=Michelle A.|last2=Hastie|first2=Warwick W.|last3=Hoyer|first3=Lauren|date=2020-09-01|title=Out of Africa: The underrepresentation of African authors in high-impact geoscience literature|url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825220303081|journal=Earth-Science Reviews|language=en|volume=208|pages=103262|doi=10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103262|bibcode=2020ESRv..20803262N|s2cid=225253161|issn=0012-8252}}</ref> (See also: [[Ubirajara jubatus#Legal issues|Ubirajara jubatus]].)
*When scientists from a central, dominant ethnic or sociological group conduct research in areas where minority groups are living (often peripheral areas), there is also a risk for helicopter research, though it may not appear directly from the academic affiliation of the researchers. For instance, within the United States, it has been used primarily in the study of [[Native Americans in the United States|Native Americans]].<ref name="cnirb2"/>

=== Climate change ===
{{Main|Climate change research}}
An analysis of research money from 1990 to 2020 for climate change, found that 78% of research money for research on [[Climate change in Africa]], was spent in European and North American institutions and more was spent for former British colonies than other countries.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Overland|first1=Indra|last2=Fossum Sagbakken|first2=Haakon|last3=Isataeva|first3=Aidai|last4=Kolodzinskaia|first4=Galina|last5=Simpson|first5=Nicholas Philip|last6=Trisos|first6=Christopher|last7=Vakulchuk|first7=Roman|date=2021-09-25|title=Funding flows for climate change research on Africa: where do they come from and where do they go?|url=https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2021.1976609|journal=Climate and Development|volume=14 |issue=8 |pages=705–724|doi=10.1080/17565529.2021.1976609|s2cid=244210557|issn=1756-5529|hdl=11250/2832233|hdl-access=free}}</ref> This in turn both prevents local researchers from doing groundbreaking work, because they don't have the funding for experimental activities and reduces investment in local researchers ideas and in topics important to the Global South, such as [[climate change adaptation]].<ref>{{Cite web|date=2021-10-05|title=Analysis: The lack of diversity in climate-science research|url=https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-the-lack-of-diversity-in-climate-science-research|access-date=2021-11-15|website=Carbon Brief|language=en}}</ref>

===Soil science===
[[Soil science|Soil scientist]]s have qualified helicopter research as a perpetuation of "colonial" science. Typically researchers from rich countries would come to establish soil profile pits or collect soil and peat samples, which is often more easily done in poor countries given the availability of cheap labour and goodwill of villagers to dig a pit on their land against small payment. The profile will be described and samples taken with the help of local people, possibly also university staff. In case of helicopter research, the outcomes are then published such as discovery in tropical peatlands, sometimes in high-level journals without the involvement of local colleagues. "Overall, helicopter research tends to produce academic papers that further the career of scientists from developed countries, but provide little practical outcomes for nations where the studies are conducted, nor develop the careers of their local scientists."<ref name="budiman" />

=== Coral Reef research ===
A 2021 study in ''[[Current Biology]]'' quantified the amount of parachute research happening in [[coral reef]] studies and found such approaches to be the norm.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Study quantifying parachute science in coral reef research shows it's 'still widespread'|url=https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2021-02/cp-sqp021821.php|access-date=2021-03-24|website=EurekAlert!|language=en}}</ref><ref name="the-scientist.com" /><ref name="Stefanoudis R184–R185" />

== Examples by region ==

=== Central Africa ===
A 2009 study found that Europeans participated in 77% of regionally co-authored papers in Central African countries.<ref name="Boshoff 413–434">{{Cite journal|last=Boshoff|first=Nelius|date=2009-04-17|title=Neo-colonialism and research collaboration in Central Africa|url=https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2211-8|journal=Scientometrics|language=en|volume=81|issue=2|pages=413–434|doi=10.1007/s11192-008-2211-8|s2cid=15609124|issn=1588-2861}}</ref> Even though local authors are credited with the work, they aren't always given participatory roles in the final production of the research itself—instead playing roles in fieldwork.<ref name="Boshoff 413–434"/>

===Indonesia===
In April 2018, a publication about [[Indonesia]]'s [[Bajau]] people received great attention. These "sea nomads" had a genetic adaptation resulting in large [[spleen]]s that supply additional oxygenated [[red blood cell]]s.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Ilardo|first1=Melissa A.|last2=Moltke|first2=Ida|last3=Korneliussen|first3=Thorfinn S.|last4=Cheng|first4=Jade|last5=Stern|first5=Aaron J.|last6=Racimo|first6=Fernando|last7=Damgaard|first7=Peter de Barros|last8=Sikora|first8=Martin|last9=Seguin-Orlando|first9=Andaine|last10=Rasmussen|first10=Simon|last11=Munckhof|first11=Inge C. L. van den|date=2018-04-19|title=Physiological and Genetic Adaptations to Diving in Sea Nomads|journal=Cell|language=English|volume=173|issue=3|pages=569–580.e15|doi=10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.054|issn=0092-8674|pmid=29677510|doi-access=free}}</ref>

Yet, a month later this publication was criticised by Indonesian scientists. Their article in ''[[Science (journal)|Science]]'' questioned the ethics of scientists from the United States and [[Denmark]] who took [[DNA]] samples of the Bajau people and analysed them, without much involvement of Bajau or other Indonesian people.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Rochmyaningsih|first=Dyna|date=2018-07-26|title=Did a study of Indonesian people who spend most of their days under water violate ethical rules?|url=https://www.science.org/content/article/did-study-indonesian-people-who-spend-their-days-under-water-violate-ethical-rules|access-date=2021-03-24|website=Science {{!}} AAAS|language=en}}</ref><ref name="Conversation_helicopter_research_ID">{{cite web|last1=Minasny|first1=Budiman|last2=Fiantis|first2=Dian|date=2018-08-29|title='Helicopter research': who benefits from international studies in Indonesia?|url=https://theconversation.com/helicopter-research-who-benefits-from-international-studies-in-indonesia-102165|url-status=live|archive-url=https://archive.today/20210116141559/https://theconversation.com/helicopter-research-who-benefits-from-international-studies-in-indonesia-102165|archive-date=2021-01-16|access-date=2021-01-16|website=[[The Conversation (website)|The Conversation]]}}</ref>

==See also==
{{colbegin|colwidth=27em}}
* [[Academic dishonesty]]
* [[Bioethics]]
* [[Biopiracy]]
* [[Bullying in academia]]
* [[Committee on Publication Ethics]]
* [[Conflicts of interest in academic publishing]]
* [[Research ethics]]
* [[Research integrity]]
* [[Scientific method]]
{{colend}}

==References==
{{Reflist}}

{{Science and technology studies|state=collapsed}}

[[Category:Ethics of science and technology|Misconduct]]
[[Category:Science in society]]