Goal-line technology

From KYNNpedia
Revision as of 13:40, 10 February 2024 by 41.246.128.202 (talk) (→‎Continental)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Diagram of the use of multiple cameras in the GoalControl goal-line technology system.
Sometimes it is difficult for the naked eye to see if the ball has crossed the line.
Sometimes it is difficult for the naked eye to see if the ball has crossed the line.

In association football, goal-line technology (sometimes referred to as a Goal Decision System)<ref>"Wenger praise for Goal Decision System". PremierLeague.com. 8 August 2013. Retrieved 10 August 2013.</ref> is the use of electronic aid to determine if a goal has been scored or not. In detail, it is a method used to determine when the ball has completely crossed the goal line in between the goal-posts and underneath the crossbar with the assistance of electronic devices and at the same time assisting the referee in awarding a goal or not. The objective of goal-line technology (GLT) is not to replace the role of the officials, but rather to support them in their decision-making. The GLT must provide a clear indication as to whether the ball has fully crossed the line, and this information will serve to assist the referee in making their final decision.<ref>FIFA (2012). "Testing Manual" (PDF). FIFA Quality Programme for Goal Line Technology. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 October 2012.</ref>

Compared to similar technology in other sports, goal-line technology is a relatively recent addition to association football, its integration having been opposed by the sport's authorities. In July 2012, the International Football Association Board (IFAB) officially approved the use of goal-line technology, amending the Laws of the Game to permit (but not require) its use. Due to its expense, goal-line technology is only used at the highest levels of the game. Goal-line technology is currently used in the top European domestic leagues and at major international competitions such as, since 2014, the Men's and Women's FIFA World Cups.<ref>Thomas, K. (2014). "Keeping an eye on the ball". SPIE Newsroom. doi:10.1117/2.2201406.01.</ref><ref>FIFA.com (1 April 2014). "Goal-line technology set up ahead of FIFA World Cup". Archived from the original on 11 May 2014.</ref><ref>FIFA.com</ref><ref>"Hawk-Eye confirmed as goal-line technology provider for Canada 2015". FIFA. 31 March 2015. Archived from the original on 31 March 2015. Retrieved 2 June 2015.]</ref>

Background

See also: Scoring in association football
If the line in this diagram is the goal line between the goal posts, the only case in which a goal has been scored is position D.

In association football, a goal is scored if the whole of the ball crosses the goal line between the goalposts and under the crossbar. In most cases, this is relatively unambiguous (goal nets being a low-tech way of verifying that the ball passed the correct side of the goalposts). Occasionally however situations occur when it is difficult for referees and their assistants to tell if a goal has been scored before a rebound, save, or defender's clearance from the goal area.

Rules

Since 2012, goal-line technology has been permitted in matches. Text relating to goal-line technology can now be found within four of the Laws of the Game:

  • Law 1 (The Field of Play): permitting modifications to the goal frame.
  • Law 2 (The Ball): permitting the use of approved balls with integrated technology.
  • Law 5 (The Referee): requiring the referee to test a goal-line technology system prior to a match and not use it if a fault is found.
  • Law 10 (Determining the outcome of a match): permitting use of goal-line technology to verify whether or not goals have been scored. It states that "the use of GLT must be stipulated in the respective competition rules".

The Laws themselves are not specific as to the nature of goal line technology systems, however other documentation from FIFA, which is cited by the Laws, goes into more detail. The FIFA Quality Programme for GLT Testing Manual<ref>"Updated goal-line technology testing manual published – FIFA Quality Programme". Archived from the original on 15 May 2015.</ref> precisely define the requirements of the systems. Four basic requirements of a system are stipulated:

  • The system must address only the matter of whether a goal has been scored or not.
  • The system must be accurate.
  • The system must indicate the scoring of a goal immediately, confirming this within one second.
  • The system must communicate its information solely to the match officials (via vibration and visual alert on the referee's watch)

FIFA have a system whereby a particular technology provider needs to show effectiveness to successfully obtain a license for their technology, then an installation within a particular stadium must pass a "final installation test" before use, and before each game the referee must check that the system is functional.<ref>"TESTING MANUAL 2014 version 2.0". FIFA Quality Programme for Goal-Line Technology (PDF). FIFA.com. 2014. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 July 2018.</ref><ref>"Final installation test – FIFA Quality Programme". Archived from the original on 6 July 2015.</ref>

Competitions using goal-line technology

Due to the expense of goal-line technology systems, the technology is only currently used at the very top levels of the game. In domestic competition, goal-line technology is only regularly used in a few major European leagues:

Club competitions

International

Continental

Domestic leagues

Domestic cups

National team competitions

International

Continental

As of June 2023, FIFA's website list 112 stadiums with licensed GLT installations, 94 of which use the Hawk-Eye system.<ref name="FTRH">"FOOTBALL TECHNOLOGY – Resource Hub". FIFA.</ref> The other 18 use Vieww, which is the other licensed provider.<ref name="FTRH"/>

History

Pre-implementation history

Prior to 2012, competitions were unable to implement technology as provision was not made for it in the Laws. The Laws of association football are controlled by the International Football Association Board (IFAB), a body on which FIFA holds 50% of the voting power, sufficient to veto any changes to the laws.

Pre-2011

Compared to other sports, association football was late to allow technology to assist with in-game decisions. The matter was a subject of debate within the game for over a decade with the game's lawmakers resisting calls for its implementation.

Throughout the 2000s various incidents incited discussion as to the potential for goal-line technology<ref>"Nigerian media bitter in defeat". BBC Sport. 14 February 2000. Retrieved 1 August 2012.</ref><ref>"Manchester United 0–0 Tottenham". BBC News. 4 January 2005. Retrieved 28 June 2010.</ref><ref>"Bristol City-Crystal Palace game will not be replayed". The Guardian. London. 17 August 2009.</ref><ref name="UK_PM">Emery, Daniel (28 June 2010). "PM and goal-line technology firms dispute Fifa claims". BBC. Retrieved 23 April 2015.</ref> or a 'phantom goal'<ref>Miller, Herman (15 August 2009). "Neil Warnock furious as 'phantom goal' costs Crystal Palace". The Guardian. London.</ref> in the game. The lack of use of technology in association football was contrasted with other sports, which had incorporated video replays and other systems into their rules.

In response to this, FIFA decided to test a system by Adidas in which a football with an embedded microchip would send a signal to the referee if it crossed a sensor going through the goal.<ref name="geekweek1">McGrath, Liam (19 April 2010). "Goal-Line Technology: Crossing Too Many Lines For FIFA?". GeekWeek. Retrieved 28 June 2010.</ref> According to then-FIFA president Sepp Blatter, who was later forced out of football for his part in a serious corruption scandal, "We did different tests at the Under-17 World Cup in Peru but the evidence wasn't clear so we will carry out trials in junior competitions in 2007".<ref name="geekweek1" /> However, those trials did not materialise and by 2008, Blatter had rejected the system outright, describing the technology as "only 95% accurate".<ref name="geekweek1" /> FIFA and IFAB were resistant to introducing technology in the game, voting in March 2010 to permanently ditch the technology.<ref>"Football's lawmakers reject goal-line technology". BBC. 6 March 2010. Retrieved 23 April 2015.</ref>

Following several refereeing errors at the 2010 FIFA World Cup – including the disallowed goal in Germany's 4–1 victory over England, when Frank Lampard hit a shot from outside of the penalty box that bounced off the crossbar and over the line; the ball came back out and the goal was disallowed because the assistant referee did not call for a goal<ref>Wilson, Jonathan (28 June 2010). "Soccer could use instant replay, but not at expense of the sport's flow". CNN.</ref> – Blatter announced that FIFA would reopen the goal-line technology discussion.<ref name="nytimes.com">Marcus, Jeffrey (29 June 2010). "FIFA President Apologizes for Refereeing Errors". The New York Times. Retrieved 29 June 2010.</ref>

Before Euro 2012, UEFA president Michel Platini dismissed the need for goal-line technology, instead arguing for placing additional assistant referees behind the goal. However, in a Group D match with Ukraine losing 1–0 to England, a shot by Ukraine's Marko Dević shot briefly crossed the line within clear view of the goal-line official before it was cleared by England's John Terry, reopening the debate, although an offside in the build-up to the incident was too unnoticed by the match officials.<ref>"Euro 2012: Ukraine's ghost goal against England another example of why we need goal-line technology, says Sepp Blatter". The Daily Telegraph. 20 June 2012.</ref><ref>"Rooney seizes his chance to lift England's expectations". The Independent. 20 June 2012. Retrieved 20 June 2012.</ref>

Initial testing

File:Teamgeist II adidas.jpg
The Adidas Teamgeist II with implanted chip, part of the proposed Cairos-Adidas system for goal-line technology

Heeding calls for the use of technology, in July 2011 FIFA began a process of sanctioned tests that eventually resulted in the approval of the systems used in the current game.

The first stage of testing considered multiple goal-line technology systems, with the requirement that the system notified the referee of the decision within one second of the incident happening. The message needed to be relayed via a visual signal and vibration.<ref name="july 2011">"Fifa to run tests on nine goal-line technology systems this autumn". The Guardian. London. 21 July 2011.</ref> Tests were conducted by Empa between September and December 2011.<ref name="March 2012 IFAB/FIFA">Conway, Richard (15 April 2012). "Goal-line technology edges closer". BBC Sport. Retrieved 3 March 2012.</ref> Tested systems included:<ref name="March 2012 IFAB/FIFA" />

Second phase of testing

On 3 March 2012, IFAB announced that two of the eight proposed systems had proceeded to the second stage of testing. These were Hawk-Eye and GoalRef.<ref name="March 2012 IFAB/FIFA"/> In the second phase of testing, the manufacturer of the technology chose a stadium to test its technology in a number of imagined scenarios. Testing was also conducted in professional training sessions and in laboratories to account for different climatic conditions and other magnetic field distortions. There were also tests on the watches to be worn by referees. The systems underwent testing in some competitive matches.

GoalRef technology underwent match testing in some Danish Superliga matches in the first half of 2012.<ref>Berendt, Lars (16 May 2012). "FIFA tester teknologi i Silkeborg og Farum" (in dansk). Danish Football Association. Retrieved 16 May 2012.</ref><ref>"The ball tells you when it's in". Archived from the original on 5 November 2018. Retrieved 29 June 2014.</ref> Following the second phase trials, on 5 July 2012 IFAB approved GoalRef in principle, making it available for use in professional matches under a set of revised Laws of the Game. Each installation however would also require licensing approval for use in the individual stadium, on a 12-month basis. The 2012 FIFA Club World Cup was the first tournament where GoalRef was used by a match referee. Goal Ref was used for the first time on 6 December 2012 in the first match of the 2012 FIFA Club World Cup.<ref>"FIFA give debut to goal-line technology in World club curtain-raiser". Irish Independent. 6 December 2012. Retrieved 6 December 2012.</ref>

The first match to use the Hawk-Eye goal-line technology was Eastleigh F.C. versus A.F.C. Totton in the Hampshire Senior Cup final at St Mary's Stadium, Southampton in England on 16 May 2012. Although it used Hawk-Eye, the system had no bearing on the referee's decisions and the system readings were only available to FIFA's independent testing agency.<ref name="April bbc">"Non-league final to be used for goal-line technology experiment". BBC Sport. 27 April 2012.</ref> The system was also in place for the technology's second test on 2 June for England's friendly match against Belgium.<ref name="belgium/eng announcement">Jackson, Jamie (24 May 2012). "England friendly against Belgium to be big test of goalline technology". The Guardian. London.</ref>

Introduction

Edin Džeko of Manchester City scored the first goal in the Premier League that was given by goal-line technology

Following the success of the trials, in July 2012 IFAB voted unanimously to officially amend the Laws of the Game to permit (but not require) goal-line technology.<ref name=IFABofficial>"IFAB makes three unanimous historic decisions". FIFA.com. Fédération Internationale de Football Association. 5 July 2012. Archived from the original on 7 May 2015. Retrieved 23 April 2015.</ref>

In December 2012, FIFA announced it would introduce goal-line technology at the 2012 FIFA Club World Cup in Japan.<ref>"Goal-line tech gets green light". 3 News NZ. 6 December 2012.</ref> Hawk-Eye technology was employed at Toyota Stadium, while GoalRef was used at International Stadium Yokohama.

GoalControl, a camera-based system which uses 14 high-speed cameras located around the pitch and directed at both goals, was used at the 2013 Confederations Cup, partly as a trial for use at the next year's World Cup.<ref>Fifield, Dominic (2 April 2013). "Fifa snubs Hawk-Eye in favour of German goalline technology". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 4 April 2013.</ref><ref name="BBCgoalcontrol">"GoalControl to provide goal-line system at World Cup in Brazil". BBC. 2 April 2013. Retrieved 3 April 2013.</ref>

The Football Association introduced Hawk-Eye during the 2013–14 Premier League season and the later rounds of the 2013–14 Football League Cup.<ref name="BBC_Premier">"Goal-line technology: Premier League votes in favour for 2013–14". BBC. 11 April 2013. Retrieved 11 April 2013.</ref><ref>BBC: Football League to use goal-line technology in Capital One Cup</ref> A League Cup quarter-final match on 17 December 2013 saw the first goal-line technology-assisted decision in English football<ref>BBC: Sunderland 2–1 Chelsea</ref> and the first goal to be decisively awarded using the technology in the English Premier League was Edin Džeko's goal for Manchester City against Cardiff City on 18 January 2014.<ref>Williams, Tom (19 January 2014). "Arsenal stay top, technology aids Manchester City". The Sydney Morning Herald.</ref>

Following success at the Confederations Cup, GoalControl was used at the 2014 FIFA World Cup. The first goal given by the technology was on 15 June 2014 group stage match between France and Honduras.<ref>"France 3–0 Honduras". BBC Sport. 15 June 2014. Retrieved 15 June 2014.</ref>

Goal Line Technology was implemented across the major European competitions. In December 2014, the Bundesliga clubs approved goal-line technology that will be introduced at the start of the 2015–16 Bundesliga season. The league picked the cheaper Hawk-Eye system over two German technologies.<ref>"Bundesliga approves Hawk-Eye goal-line technology for new season".</ref> GoalControl was introduced for Ligue 1 for the start of the 2015–16 Ligue 1 season.<ref>"Ligue1.com – LFP adopts goal-line technology". Archived from the original on 11 March 2016. Retrieved 6 January 2016.</ref><ref name="GC_L1">"Ligue 1 decides to go with GoalControl | GoalControl – Advanced Goal Line Technology". www.goalcontrol.de. Retrieved 13 July 2018.</ref> Ligue 1 later switched to using Hawk-Eye in 2018 after the GoalControl system made errors.<ref name="L1-GC-HE">Holyman, Ian (26 April 2018). "Hawk-Eye to provide goal-line tech in Ligue 1". ESPN.com. Retrieved 13 July 2018.</ref>

Goal Line Technology was used in the UEFA Europa League final, UEFA Champions League, European Championship and Copa America for the first time in 2016.<ref>"Goalline technology to be used in Champions League final". BBC Sport.</ref><ref>"Uefa to use goal-line technology at Euro 2016 and in Champions League". TheGuardian.com. Press Association. 22 January 2016.</ref><ref>"Copa America to use goal-line technology". 26 May 2016.</ref>

Criticism

Human element is lost

While advocates for goal-line technology maintain that it would significantly reduce refereeing errors during play, there are also criticisms of the technology. Much of the criticism came from within FIFA itself including disgraced former FIFA president Blatter. Apart from the criticisms revolving around the technical aspects of the two proposed technologies, critics allege that such technology would impact on the human element of the game and eliminate what they promote as the laudable activity of debating mistakes.<ref>Kelso, Paul (27 June 2010). "England v Germany: Frank Lampard's 'goal' reignites goal-line technology debate". The Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 30 June 2010. Retrieved 28 June 2010.</ref> Blatter has been quoted as saying, "Other sports regularly change the laws of the game to react to the new technology. ... We don't do it and this makes the fascination and the popularity of football."<ref>CBC Sports (8 March 2008). "FIFA halts instant replay experiment". Cbc.ca. Retrieved 28 June 2010.</ref>

A study suggested that in the 2010–11 Premier League season "errors took place nearly 30% of the time that video replays could help prevent", but some people claim that instant replays would interrupt the flow of the game and take away possible plays.<ref>"Sport technology enables improved decisions". newelectronics.co.uk. 11 October 2011. Retrieved 13 March 2012.</ref>

Other critics believe it would be prohibitively expensive to implement the technology at all levels of the game and particularly for smaller/poorer football associations. FIFA officials have expressed a preference for "better refereeing" as well as more match officials over implementing the technology.<ref>Kelso, Paul (27 June 2010). "England v Germany: Fifa want 'better refereeing' not goal-line technology". The Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 27 June 2010. Retrieved 28 June 2010.</ref> Advocates, in turn, cite the many examples of incorrect goal-line decisions deciding important games and point out that the technology has improved much since the initial trials carried out by FIFA. Advocates contend that any extra help for the referee should outweigh arguments that it would lead to non-uniform rules (since not all football associations would be able to implement it).

Blatter had been opposed to goal-line technology until Frank Lampard's disallowed goal in the 2010 World Cup where the ball clearly crossed the line.<ref name="july 2011"/><ref>"Soccer: No goal-line aids until 2013". London: ESPN. 5 October 2011. Retrieved 13 March 2012.</ref><ref>theguardian.com (11 December 2012). "Michel Platini: goalline technology money would be better spent on grassroots – video". TheGuardian.com.</ref>

The introduction of additional assistant referees, who are mostly positioned beside the goal line, was partly in order to facilitate in such situations.

Cost

In April 2013, MLS commissioner Don Garber confirmed that MLS would not adopt goal-line technology for the 2014 season, citing cost as the overriding factor. GoalControl installation would cost about $260,000 per stadium, and a further $3,900 for each game.<ref>"mlssoccer.com – MLS Commissioner Don Garber says league won't adopt goal-line technology by 2014".</ref>

In early 2014, the vast majority of teams in the two divisions of the German Bundesliga voted against introducing goal-line technology for financial reasons. The costs per club would have ranged from €250,000 for a chip inside the ball up to €500,000 for Hawk-Eye or GoalControl. The manager of 1. FC Köln, Jörg Schmadtke, summarized the vote with "The cost is so exorbitant, that using this (technology) is not acceptable".<ref>Fußball: Bundesliga verzichtet auf Torlinientechnik, Spiegel Online, 2014-03-24.</ref>

World governing body FIFA are set to make £300,000 from the Premier League's decision to install goal-line technology in all top-flight stadiums before the start of next season. Each of the 20 clubs will have to pay FIFA £15,000 to install, test and receive the 'FIFA quality seal' for Hawk-Eye's camera-based system, which is expected to cost around £250,000 per ground in total. FIFA will also make an extra £15,000 from Wembley Stadium, which will have the technology installed for use in events such as the FA Cup semi-finals and final.[citation needed]

The Scottish Professional Football League stated in December 2017 that it would not be implementing goal-line technology, as it is only affordable for the richest leagues in Europe.<ref>Sutherland, Jonathan (28 December 2017). "Goal-line technology 'unaffordable' for Scottish Premiership". BBC Sport. BBC. Retrieved 28 December 2017.</ref>

Failures

Multiple errors in the 2017–18 Coupe de la Ligue quarter-finals led to the use of the GoalControl system being temporarily suspended by the Ligue de Football Professionnel.<ref>"French league suspends goal-line technology after errors". Reuters. 12 January 2018. Retrieved 19 June 2020.</ref> It failed to award Paris Saint-Germain their second goal against Amiens, which the video assistant referee (VAR) overturned. In the match between Angers and Montpellier, the system incorrectly flagged the referee, causing the match officials to not use it for the second half.<ref>"French league suspends goalline technology after cup errors". BBC Sport. 11 January 2018. Retrieved 19 June 2020.</ref>

The system came under scrutiny in June 2020 after a Premier League match between Aston Villa and Sheffield United as the technology failed to award a goal for Sheffield United despite the fact that Aston Villa goalkeeper Ørjan Nyland had carried the ball over the goal line after mishandling a free kick from Sheffield United's Oliver Norwood by colliding with teammate Keinan Davis.<ref>"Sheffield United fume after being denied goal on Premier League return". The Independent. 17 June 2020. Retrieved 18 June 2020.</ref> As no goal was signalled, the match officials decided not to let VAR intervene, and the game finished goalless.<ref>"MW30 VAR review: Why Sheff Utd were denied a goal". Premier League. 18 June 2020. Retrieved 21 January 2021.</ref> Hawk-Eye apologised, explaining the failure as due to an anomalous amount of occlusion of its cameras' view of the incident.<ref>"Hawk-Eye apologise for missing Sheffield United goal". RTÉ Sport. Raidió Teilifís Éireann. 17 June 2020. Retrieved 21 January 2021.</ref>

The system came under further scrutiny in 2022 after an EFL Championship game between Huddersfield Town and Blackpool FC saw Yuta Nakayama head the ball over the goal line before being scrambled out by Daniel Grimshaw. As the goal was not signalled by Hawk-Eye, the referee did not award a goal and the match finished 0–1 to Blackpool. The EFL released a statement the next day, insisting that the referee's decision was "final" and "the match result stands".<ref>"Huddersfield denied goal after 'Hawk-Eye failure'". BBC Sport. Retrieved 5 September 2022.</ref>

See also

Notes

<references group="lower-alpha" responsive="1"></references>

References

<references group="" responsive="0"></references>

External links

Retrieved from "https://kynnco.com:443/kynnpedia/index.php?title=Goal-line_technology&oldid=4870"