Blue skies research
Blue skies research (also called blue sky science) is scientific research in domains where "real-world" applications are not immediately apparent. It has been defined as "research without a clear goal"<ref name="bell 33"> Bell, David (2005). Science, Technology and Culture. McGraw-Hill International. p. 33. ISBN 978-0-335-21326-9. </ref> and "curiosity-driven science". It is sometimes used interchangeably with the term "basic research".<ref name="linden 2008"> Linden, Belinda (February 29, 2008). "Basic Blue Skies Research in the UK: Are we losing out?". Journal of Biomedical Discovery and Collaboration. 3 (1): 3. doi:10.1186/1747-5333-3-3. PMC 2292148. PMID 18312612. </ref> Proponents of this mode of science argue that unanticipated scientific breakthroughs are sometimes more valuable than the outcomes of agenda-driven research, heralding advances in genetics and stem cell biology as examples of unforeseen benefits of research that was originally seen as purely theoretical in scope. Because of the inherently uncertain return on investment, blue-sky projects are sometimes politically and commercially unpopular and tend to lose funding to research perceived as being more reliably profitable or practical.<ref name="times 2005">Henderson, Mark (September 19, 2005). "Politics clouds blue-sky science". The Times. Retrieved April 26, 2010.</ref>
Terminology
The term blue sky research comes from Comroe's retrospectoscope in 1976 on the research done in 1869 on why the sky is blue. This research was initially thought to be of no value but led to many other discoveries of much more direct use.<ref>Comroe J. Retrospectroscope – What makes the Sky Blue? American Review Respiratory Disease. 1976;113:219–22.</ref>
History
Support for blue skies research has varied over time, ultimately becoming subject to the political process, in countries such as the United States, the United Kingdom,<ref>"To what extent should UK funding for science and innovation be focussed?". Foundation for Science and Technology. Retrieved February 21, 2009.</ref> and India. Vannevar Bush's 1945 report, Science: The Endless Frontier, made the argument for the value of basic research in the postwar era, and was the basis for many appeals to the federal funding of basic research.<ref name="smith 1997"> Smith, C.H. Llewellyn (1997). The use of basic science. CERN. </ref> The 1957 launch of Sputnik prompted the United States Air Force Office of Scientific Research to sponsor blue skies research into the 1960s.<ref name="jeffrey"> Jeffrey, Richard C. (1990). The Logic of Decision. University of Chicago Press. pp. xiv. ISBN 978-0-226-39582-1. </ref> By the 1970s, financial strains brought pressure on public expenditure on the sciences, first in the UK and the Netherlands, and by the 1990s in Germany and the United States.<ref name="smith 1997"/>
In 1980, BP established a blue skies research initiative called the Venture Research Unit, headed by particle physicist Donald Braben. Braben controversially challenged peer review as the mechanism for establishing funding, emphasizing the selection of researchers whose proposals "could radically change the way we think about something important."<ref name=" review 2004"> Fedoroff, Nina (January 27, 2005). "Peering out of the box (Review of 'Pioneering Research: A Risk Worth Taking')". Nature. 433 (7024): 361. doi:10.1038/433361a. </ref>
In 2005, Mark Walport, director of the Wellcome Trust and former Professor of Medicine at Imperial College, London warned that excessive emphasis on agenda-driven research could jeopardise serendipitous advances in science:
The Government is right to recognise the importance of science and technology, but I think it is a mistake to try to ring-fence funds. There is a serious danger that we will spend money on projects that are less good. It is absolutely key that funding is used to support the best scientists with the best ideas.<ref name="times 2005"/>
When UK research councils introduced a requirement that grant application include a 2-page statement on the economic impact of the proposed work, 20 scientists, including 1996 Nobel laureate Harold Kroto, wrote a public letter to Times Higher Education condemning the requirement and calling for peer reviewers to ignore the additional documentation.<ref name="sciencemag blog"> Travis, John (February 12, 2009). "Is the (Blue) Sky Falling in the U.K?". ScienceInsider. Science. Archived from the original on February 18, 2009. Retrieved February 23, 2009. </ref>
Grants and conferences
Until 2020 The Royal Society granted up to 1 million pounds sterling annually in Theo Murphy Blue Skies awards. The award was to fund "research which is considered to be original and exciting but lacks a sufficient evidence base in the literature to be supported by traditional grant schemes."<ref name="royal"> "Theo Murphy Blue Skies awards". The Royal Society. Retrieved November 21, 2023. </ref>
The UK-based Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) operates a program called the IDEAS Factory, intended to promote "blue sky, curiosity-led research."<ref name="nottingham"> "IDEAS Factory" (Press release). UKRI. August 17, 2021. Retrieved February 6, 2024. </ref>
The international Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) holds a "Blue Sky Forum" every decade.<ref>"Blue Sky II 2006". Statistics Canada. Archived from the original on 2009-01-16.</ref>
Subjects
Owing to its radical nature, blue sky science may challenge accepted scientific paradigms and introduce entirely new fields of study.<ref name="linden 2008"/> It has been the inspiration for numerous works of science fiction. It has sometimes been concerned with topics such as unexplained phenomena and the impact of future technologies upon society, asking questions such as "How would a spacecraft traverse a black hole and where would it arrive upon leaving it?" and "Will the universe end, or will it just expand ever outwards for eternity?"[citation needed]
See also
References
Sources
- Balaram, P. (January 10, 1999). "Editorial: Blue sky research" (PDF). Current Science. 76 (1): 1. Retrieved February 23, 2009.
Bibliography
- Braben, Donald W. (2014). Promoting the Planck Club: How defiant youth, irreverent researchers and liberated universities can foster prosperity indefinitely. John Wiley and Sons Inc. ISBN 978-1-118-54642-0.
- Braben, Donald W. (2004). Pioneering Research: A Risk Worth Taking. John Wiley and Sons Inc. ISBN 978-0-471-48852-1.
- Braben, Donald W. (2008). Scientific Freedom: The Elixir of Civilization. John Wiley and Sons Inc. ISBN 978-0-470-22654-4.
