Vehicular metrics
From KYNNpedia
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. (March 2007) |
There are a broad range of metrics that denote the relative capabilities of various vehicles. Most of them apply to all vehicles while others are type-specific.
| Measurement | American unit | Imperial unit | Metric unit | Affects | General preference | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 to 100 km/h (0 to 60 mph) | seconds | seconds | seconds | acceleration | lower is better | |
| 0 to 100 to 0 mph | seconds | seconds | seconds | acceleration and braking | lower is better | formerly common in British publications |
| Autonomy | miles | miles | kilometers | comfort, safety, economics, range | higher is better | Autonomous means self-governing.<ref name="antsaklis1991introduction">Antsaklis, Panos J.; Passino, Kevin M.; Wang, S.J. (1991). "An Introduction to Autonomous Control Systems" (PDF). IEEE Control Systems Magazine. 11 (4): 5–13. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.840.976. doi:10.1109/37.88585. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 May 2017. Retrieved 21 January 2019.</ref> Many historical projects related to vehicle automation have been automated (made automatic) subject to a heavy reliance on artificial aids in their environment, such as magnetic strips. Autonomous control implies satisfactory performance under significant uncertainties in the environment, and the ability to compensate for system failures without external intervention.<ref name="antsaklis1991introduction" /> |
| Braking distance | feet | feet | meters | safety | shorter is better | |
| Brake specific fuel consumption | lb/(hp·h) | lb/(hp·h) | g/(kW·h) | economics, range | lower is better | |
| traveled Distance | miles | miles | kilometers | economy | higher rating is better for vehicle longevity; lower elapsed is better for vehicle resale | |
| Drag coefficient | (ratio) | (ratio) | (ratio) | economics, top speed, range | lower is better for moving into/through a fluid(air/water), higher is better for stopping/redirecting with a fluid | |
| Friction or Friction coefficient | lbf or (ratio) | lbf or (ratio) | N or (ratio) | acceleration, braking distance, traction, fuel consumption, tyre wear | lower is better on kinetic parts(drivetrain), higher is better on static parts[chassis binds/bolts/clamps/composites/nails/screws/welds, control surfaces(brake pad-to-disc and wheel-to-ground patchs)] | improved by lubricated drivetrain, dry and clean road surface/adhesion railway, reducing road slipperiness/skid (automobile) |
| Frontal cross-section area | sq ft | sq ft | m2 | economics, top speed, range, cargo capacity | lower is better | if area is too small, vehicle becomes difficult to use |
| Fuel economy | mpg (US) | mpg (imperial) | l/100 km and km/L | economics, range | greater is better (mpg and km/L), lower is better (L/100 km) | must be specified on new vehicles for sale in the US and UK |
| Maximum g-force(s) | g or ft/s2 | g or ft/s2 | g or m/s2 | acceleration, braking (safety) | higher is usually better | measures cornering, braking or forward acceleration |
| Ground pressure | psi | psi | pascals (sometimes bar) | traction | lower is better in soft ground, reduces bogging; higher with loose surface | has greater impact on off-road vehicles |
| Lift to drag ratio | (ratio) | (ratio) | (ratio) | economics, range | higher is better for airfoil/hydrofoil; lower is better for stopping/redirecting | improved by narrow, long wings |
| Noise/Vibration | dB | dB | dB | comfort, stress, health, awareness (safety), Insurance<ref>"Whole-body and hand-arm vibration". Retrieved 2022-08-09.</ref> | lower is better | Noise from traffic, is considered by the World Health Organization to be one of the worst environmental stressors for humans, second only to air pollution.<ref name="Munzel">Münzel, Thomas; Kröller-Schön, Swenja; Oelze, Matthias; Gori, Tommaso; Schmidt, Frank P.; Steven, Sebastian; Hahad, Omar; Röösli, Martin; Wunderli, Jean-Marc; Daiber, Andreas; Sørensen, Mette (2020). "Adverse Cardiovascular Effects of Traffic Noise with a Focus on Nighttime Noise and the New WHO Noise Guidelines". Annual Review of Public Health. 41: 309–328. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-081519-062400. PMID 31922930.</ref> Elevated workplace or environmental noise can cause hearing impairment, tinnitus, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, annoyance, and sleep disturbance.<ref name=":0">Münzel T, Schmidt FP, Steven S, Herzog J, Daiber A, Sørensen M (February 2018). "Environmental Noise and the Cardiovascular System". Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 71 (6): 688–697. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.12.015. PMID 29420965.</ref><ref>Kerns E, Masterson EA, Themann CL, Calvert GM (June 2018). "Cardiovascular conditions, hearing difficulty, and occupational noise exposure within US industries and occupations". American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 61 (6): 477–491. doi:10.1002/ajim.22833. PMC 6897488. PMID 29537072.</ref> Changes in the immune system and birth defects have been also attributed to noise exposure.<ref name="pmid10698728">Passchier-Vermeer W, Passchier WF (March 2000). "Noise exposure and public health". Environmental Health Perspectives. 108 Suppl 1 (Suppl 1): 123–31. doi:10.1289/ehp.00108s1123. JSTOR 3454637. PMC 1637786. PMID 10698728.</ref>
Stress from time spent around elevated noise levels has been linked with increased workplace accident rates and aggression and other anti-social behaviors.<ref name="isbn0-12-427455-2">Kryter KD (1994). The handbook of hearing and the effects of noise: physiology, psychology, and public health. Boston: Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-427455-6.</ref> The most significant sources are vehicles, aircraft, prolonged exposure to loud music, and industrial noise.<ref>"10. Noise" (PDF). Natural Resources and the Environment 2006. 2006. pp. 188–189. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 14, 2011.</ref> There are approximately 10,000 deaths per year as a result of noise in the European Union.<ref>"Noise in Europe 2014". European Environment Agency.</ref><ref>Godwin R (3 July 2018). "Sonic doom: how noise pollution kills thousands each year". The Guardian – via www.theguardian.com.</ref> A loss in situational awareness has led to many transportation disasters, including the 2015 Philadelphia train derailment.<ref>Accident Report NTSB/RAR-16/02, PB2016-103218: Derailment of Amtrak Passenger Train 188, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, May 12, 2015, National Transportation Safety Board (adopted May 17, 2016).</ref> |
| Power | hp | hp | kW | acceleration | higher is better | Refers to maximum power (high torque and speed). The rate at which torque is applied. Also the rate at which work is done. Power = Torque × RPM / 5252. Automobile manufacturers publish power measured at the crankshaft (bhp or brake horsepower). However, it is the power a car can produce at the wheels (wheel horsepower or whp) that matters when it comes to acceleration performance. Wheel horsepower equals brake horsepower minus drivetrain losses, which can be anywhere from about 10% to 25%.<ref>"Drivetrain losses (efficiency)". X-Engineer.org. Retrieved 2019-01-01.</ref> |
| Power-to-weight ratio | hp/lb | hp/lb | W/kg | acceleration | higher is better | |
| Propulsive efficiency | % | % | % | economics, range | higher is better | For rockets and aircraft, percent of the energy contained in a vehicle's propellant converted into useful energy |
| Rate of climb | feet/min | feet/min | meters/min | combat effectiveness, economics | higher is better | Applies to fighter aircraft who need to intercept or evade other fighters. In civilian aircraft this denotes how quickly they can reach optimal cruising altitude. |
| Roll center | inches | inches | mm | handling | Too many variables to state a general preference. | |
| Rolling resistance or Rolling resistance coefficient | lbf or (ratio) | lbf or (ratio) | N or (ratio) | economics, top speed, range, cargo capacity | lower is better | improved by narrow, high pressure tires with narrow, large radius, steel/titanium alloy wheels on steel/concrete. Best available examples are Railroad steel wheels on steel rails. |
| Second moment | psi (lb·sq ft) | psi (lb·sq ft) | kg·m2 | handling | lower permits quicker turn-in for cars, higher is more stable in straight line. | The moment of inertia about a vertical axis of a vehicle |
| Size | feet | feet | meters | handling, safety | lower is better for parking on narrow parking slots, higher is better for lateral Traffic collision | |
| Shift time | mSec | ms | ms | acceleration | lower is better | for vehicles equipped with automatic transmissions |
| Specific fuel consumption (thrust) | lb/(lbf·h) | lb/(lbf·h) | kg/(kgf·h) or g/(kN·s) | economics, range | lower is better (for any given speed) | in airbreathing jet engines it is improved by using more inert air for propulsion (i.e. lower exhaust velocity), in rockets, higher exhaust velocity |
| Specific fuel consumption (shaft engine) | lb/(hp·h) | lb/(hp·h) | kg/(kW·h) | economics, range | lower is better | for shaft engines less fuel use for a given output power means higher efficiency |
| specific impulse | seconds | seconds | seconds or kN·s/kg | economics, delta-v/range | higher is typically better | in airbreathing jet engines it is improved by using more inert air for propulsion (i.e. lower exhaust velocity), in rockets, higher exhaust velocity |
| Top speed | mph | mph | km/h | Maximum rate of straight line travel | higher is better | Electronically limited in some cars for safety (mostly due to concerns of tire failure at high speed)
A speed greater than the legal maximum/recommended speed limit can be considered as useless/unsafe. |
| Torque | lbf·ft or lb·ft | lbf·ft or lb·ft | N·m | acceleration | higher is better | Refers to the overall maximum torque an engine can produce, or the maximum torque an engine can produce at a given RPM. 300 lbf·ft would be like applying 300 pounds of force to the end of 1 foot long wrench, or twisting a 2-inch diameter shaft with 3600 pounds of force! |
| Turning radius | feet | feet | meters | handling | lower is better | |
| Weight, mass or Dry weight | lb | lb, long tons, cwt | kg | acceleration, braking distance, traction, fuel consumption, road and tyre wear | lower is better for road and vehicle performance and taxation; larger is usually better for large goods vehicles carrying loads | |
| Weight distribution | % | % | % | handling, acceleration, traction | close to 50:50 (%Front:%Rear) is commonly considered better | |
| Gross axle weight rating | lb/axle | lb/axle | kg/axle | durability, economics | lower is better for road and vehicle performance and taxation; larger is usually better for large goods vehicles carrying loads | Ultimately limited by the hardness of the road surface and legal limits intended to limit damage to it |
See also
- Cycling mobility
- Energy efficiency in transport – Discussing what form of transport is the most fuel efficient and economical.
- Environmental effects of transport
- Traffic survey
- Vehicle emission standard
- Walkability
References
<references group="" responsive="1"></references>
