Differential technological development

Differential technological development is a strategy of technology governance aiming to decrease risks from emerging technologies by influencing the sequence in which they are developed. On this strategy, societies would strive to delay the development of harmful technologies and their applications, while accelerating the development of beneficial technologies, especially those that offer protection against the harmful ones.<ref name="Bostrom 2002">Bostrom, Nick (2002). "Existential Risks: Analyzing Human Extinction Scenarios". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help) 9 Journal of Evolution and Technology Jetpress Oxford Research Archive</ref><ref name=":0">Ord, Toby (2020). The Precipice: Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity. United Kingdom: Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 200. ISBN 978-1526600219.</ref>

History of the idea

Differential technological development was initially proposed by philosopher Nick Bostrom in 2002<ref name="Bostrom 2002" /> and he applied the idea to the governance of artificial intelligence in his 2014 book Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies.<ref>Bostrom, Nick (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 229–237. ISBN 978-0199678112.</ref> The strategy was also endorsed by philosopher Toby Ord in his 2020 book The Precipice: Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity, who writes that "While it may be too difficult to prevent the development of a risky technology, we may be able to reduce existential risk by speeding up the development of protective technologies relative to dangerous ones."<ref name=":0" /><ref>Purtill, Corinne (21 November 2020). "How Close Is Humanity to the Edge?". The New Yorker. Retrieved 2020-11-27.</ref>

Informal discussion

Paul Christiano believes that while accelerating technological progress appears to be one of the best ways to improve human welfare in the next few decades,<ref>Muehlhauser, Anna Salamon. "RFID solutions".</ref> a faster rate of growth cannot be equally important for the far future because growth must eventually saturate due to physical limits. Hence, from the perspective of the far future, differential technological development appears more crucial.<ref name=Christiano2014>Christiano, Paul (15 Oct 2014). "On Progress and Prosperity". Effective Altruism Forum. Retrieved 21 October 2014.</ref>Template:Unreliable?

Inspired by Bostrom's proposal, Luke Muehlhauser and Anna Salamon suggested a more general project of "differential intellectual progress", in which society advances its wisdom, philosophical sophistication, and understanding of risks faster than its technological power.<ref name=Muehlhauser2012>Muehlhauser, Luke; Anna Salamon (2012). "Intelligence Explosion: Evidence and Import" (PDF): 18–19. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 October 2014. Retrieved 29 November 2013. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)</ref>Template:Unreliable?<ref name=Muehlhauser2013>Muehlhauser, Luke (2013). Facing the Intelligence Explosion. Machine Intelligence Research Institute. Retrieved 29 November 2013.</ref>Template:Unreliable? Brian Tomasik has expanded on this notion.<ref name=Tomasik2013>Tomasik, Brian (23 Oct 2013). "Differential Intellectual Progress as a Positive-Sum Project". Foundational Research Institute. Retrieved 18 February 2016.</ref>Template:Unreliable?

See also

• Existential risk